This report in the Observer on Sunday provoked "outrage" from some Christians. The Observer also
commented that "Christianity remains a force for some social good in Britain. But
for all that some define Britain as a Christian society, we must
recognise that it remains Christian in name more than in observance.
With church attendance in sharp decline, the de-coupling of state
institutions and organised religion is long overdue."
I couldn't agree more. If it makes educational sense for schools to
have fixed holidays, then the Church should be supporting the changes,
as it is for the benefit of children's education and therefore society.
For Colin Hart of the Daily-Mail-moralistic and increasingly ridiculous
"Christian" Institute to claim that the fact that one-third of the British people attend
church at Easter means that we should have school holidays around it is
nonsense. We don't even have school on Sundays, so people can still go
to church at Easter. There would still be public holidays for Good
Friday and Easter Monday.
In fact, local authorities in mainly Christian areas can still
choose to have their Spring holiday over Easter if they wish, so no
change required. But in mainly Muslim, Jewish or Hindu areas, the
authority could change the holidays if is was more appropriate to do so.
The way Christians seem to get het up about the slightest affront to their faith is
so annoying. They don't seem able to accept that Britain is a multi-faith society nowadays. They're like the Conservative neo-imperialists who can't see the global picture. Sad.